A controversy surrounds the Azteca Stadium just days before the friendly match between Mexico and Portugal, after animal collectives denounced the alleged eviction of cats that have inhabited the venue for years. What exactly is happening? The situation has raised alarms on social media, as it involves a known and tolerated feline colony inside the stadium, which is now at risk due to preparations for the international event. According to reports shared online, activists have indicated that workers linked to the stadium's renovations and logistics have begun actions to remove the animals. This is related to the venue's reopening and the need to prepare its facilities for this match, as well as for future 2026 World Cup events. Their destination is unknown One of the most delicate points revolves around the uncertainty regarding the cats' fate. Animal rights defenders have expressed concern because there is no clarity on whether they will be relocated, sheltered, or taken to a refuge. They even fear that some may be euthanized due to lack of space or proper protocols. This situation has caused outrage, as they feel the animals' well-being is not being prioritized. Feeding them is also prohibited Furthermore, another aspect that is concerning is that, according to the complaints, access to food has been restricted to facilitate their removal, which has been interpreted as an indirect displacement measure. For the collectives, this represents a questionable practice that puts the feline colony's integrity at risk. Azteca Stadium Cats at Risk: Where Will They Be Taken? Activists and rescuers report that on March 25, the cats living at the Azteca Stadium will be “removed.” The Azteca Stadium cats are one of the most beloved colonies in Mexico City, which has coexisted with... As for responsibility, accusations mainly point to the stadium's administration and the companies in charge of the works, although so far there has been no official stance that clarifies the situation. Meanwhile, activists have requested the intervention of capital authorities to ensure that any action is carried out under animal protection standards. The case is still developing and has generated intense debate, right on the eve of a match that was meant to be a sporting celebration, but is now also marked by social concern.
